Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)

On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 19:39 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:31 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
>  
> > Older ALSA with a newer kernel has never been supported.  Why would you
> > want to replace the ALSA in the kernel with an old version?
> 
> Because it is not an older version?
> "cat /proc/asound/version" for the 2.6.15 in kernel tree prints this:
>   Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.10rc3
> That should be older than 1.0.10 final.

Ah, sorry.  Then you're right, this patch must have slipped through the
cracks.

> (plus 1.0.10 has drivers that are not yet in the kernel tree AFAIK)

Yeah I never liked this practice, I think all ALSA drivers should be in
the kernel.  IMHO an immature driver is better than no driver.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
    • From: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
    • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
    • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
    • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
    • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
    • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
    • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
    • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [PNP] 'modalias' sysfs export
• Previous by thread: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
• Next by thread: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]