J M Cerqueira Esteves wrote: > I'll test it in a few hours, after a short "barbaric" test > inspired (perhaps naively) by those call traces: running with a 2.6.15.4 > without SCSI cd-rom support (with multiple Gaussian processes, no > oom-killings until now (3 hours)). And still running after 10 hours, but now I increased the load adding another Gaussian run (still not requiring swap) and oom-killer manifested itself again, although no killings were reported: [35948.126969] Call Trace:<ffffffff8015efcb>{out_of_memory+23} <ffffffff80161177>{__alloc_pages+572} [35948.127018] <ffffffff8017fc25>{bio_copy_user+219} <ffffffff801debbf>{blk_rq_map_user+133} [35948.127073] <ffffffff801e1b61>{sg_io+351} <ffffffff801e1ff8>{scsi_cmd_ioctl+494} [35948.127135] <ffffffff80130465>{__wake_up+56} <ffffffff80265aac>{sock_def_readable+52} [35948.127162] <ffffffff802c5d68>{unix_dgram_sendmsg+1085} <ffffffff88077e35>{:sd_mod:sd_ioctl+371} [35948.127231] <ffffffff801e0058>{blkdev_driver_ioctl+93} <ffffffff801e0726>{blkdev_ioctl+1613} [35948.127277] <ffffffff8018ce76>{do_select+1137} <ffffffff8026321e>{sys_sendto+251} [35948.127334] <ffffffff8018c941>{__pollwait+0} <ffffffff801813d2>{block_ioctl+27} [35948.127367] <ffffffff8018c091>{do_ioctl+33} <ffffffff8018c36c>{vfs_ioctl+643} [35948.127383] <ffffffff8018c3e0>{sys_ioctl+91} <ffffffff8010fa46>{system_call+126} [35948.127419] [35948.127453] oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1, order=0 [35948.127456] Mem-info: [35948.127458] DMA per-cpu: [35948.127461] cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [35948.127464] cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [35948.127468] cpu 1 hot: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [35948.127471] cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [35948.127474] cpu 2 hot: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [35948.127478] cpu 2 cold: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [35948.127481] cpu 3 hot: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [35948.127484] cpu 3 cold: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [35948.127487] DMA32 per-cpu: [35948.127490] cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:173 [35948.127494] cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:55 [35948.127497] cpu 1 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:64 [35948.127501] cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:10 [35948.127504] cpu 2 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:148 [35948.127508] cpu 2 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:5 [35948.127511] cpu 3 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:157 [35948.127515] cpu 3 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:11 [35948.127517] Normal per-cpu: [35948.127521] cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:144 [35948.127524] cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:50 [35948.127528] cpu 1 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:24 [35948.127531] cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:7 [35948.127535] cpu 2 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:30 [35948.127538] cpu 2 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:15 [35948.127541] cpu 3 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:17 [35948.127545] cpu 3 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:14 [35948.127548] HighMem per-cpu: empty [35948.127552] Free pages: 84424kB (0kB HighMem) [35948.127557] Active:827765 inactive:133975 dirty:283294 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:21106 slab:20548 mapped:432093 pagetables:1441 [35948.127563] DMA free:20kB min:24kB low:28kB high:36kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:12464kB pages_scanned:2 all_unreclaimable? yes [35948.127568] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 3255 4013 4013 [35948.127576] DMA32 free:82028kB min:6564kB low:8204kB high:9844kB active:2587856kB inactive:511984kB present:3333792kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [35948.127580] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 757 757 [35948.127587] Normal free:2376kB min:1528kB low:1908kB high:2292kB active:723204kB inactive:23916kB present:775680kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [35948.127592] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 [35948.127598] HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:128kB high:128kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [35948.127602] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 [35948.127606] DMA: 1*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 20kB [35948.127619] DMA32: 931*4kB 664*8kB 216*16kB 169*32kB 94*64kB 6*128kB 36*256kB 0*512kB 1*1024kB 19*2048kB 2*4096kB = 82028kB [35948.127632] Normal: 8*4kB 51*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2376kB [35948.127644] HighMem: empty [35948.127648] Swap cache: add 120, delete 120, find 14/25, race 0+1 [35948.127651] Free swap = 3517904kB [35948.127654] Total swap = 3518152kB [35948.127656] Free swap: 3517904kB [35948.146970] 1245184 pages of RAM [35948.146974] 232833 reserved pages [35948.146977] 424256 pages shared [35948.146980] 0 pages swap cached I'll now test the x86_64-mm-blk-bounce.patch (with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER enabled). Best regards J Esteves -- +351 939838775 Skype:jmcerqueira http://del.icio.us/jmce
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] zaurus keyboard driver updates
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code
- Previous by thread: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- Next by thread: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- Index(es):