Andrew Morton wrote: > We have a candidate fix at > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc5/2.6.16-rc5-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-blk-bounce.patch. > Could you test that? (and don't alter the Cc: list!). The patch is > against 2.6.16-rc5. Thanks! I'll test it in a few hours, after a short "barbaric" test inspired (perhaps naively) by those call traces: running with a 2.6.15.4 without SCSI cd-rom support (with multiple Gaussian processes, no oom-killings until now (3 hours)). Best regards J Esteves
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- References:
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] fix pci_request_region[s] arg
- Next by Date: Re: SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA support?
- Previous by thread: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- Next by thread: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- Index(es):
 |