Andrew Morton wrote: > We have a candidate fix at > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc5/2.6.16-rc5-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-blk-bounce.patch. > Could you test that? (and don't alter the Cc: list!). The patch is > against 2.6.16-rc5. Testing that kernel now, with good news: the machine has been apparently stable, running Gaussian processes for the last 20 hours, with no oom-killer messages. A new "feature": 36 of these kernel message pairs as boot time: device-mapper: dm-linear: Device lookup failed device-mapper: error adding target to table Many thanks and best regards J Esteves -- +351 939838775 Skype:jmcerqueira http://del.icio.us/jmce
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- References:
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- Next by Date: Re: Fw: Re: oops in choose_configuration()
- Previous by thread: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- Next by thread: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- Index(es):