>> Well, not directly topic'ed to CONFIG_UNIX, but if the IPv4 stack was modular >> (like IPv6), we'd probably gain some 100 KB and would not have to worry about >> CONFIG_UNIX for a while. > >I doubt making the IPv4 stack modular is worth the trouble, but feel >free to send a patch as a basis for a discussion... > It would possibly require EXPORT_SYMBOLs, which you seem to be opposed to... Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: make IPV4 modular (was: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: make IPV4 modular (was: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool)
- References:
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Prev by Date: how to find out which module was built by which .config variables?
- Next by Date: Re: is there a COW inside the kernel ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Next by thread: Re: make IPV4 modular (was: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool)
- Index(es):
 |