Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:31:34PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > 
> > It does also matter in the kernel image size case, since you have to put 
> > enough modules to the other medium for having a effect bigger than the
> > kernel image size increase from setting CONFIG_MODULES=y.
> 
> That's not very difficult considering the large number of modules that's
> out there that a system may wish to use.
>...

This might be true for full-blown desktop systems - but these do not 
tend to be the systems where kernel image size matters that much.
Smaller kernel image size might be an issue e.g. for distribution 
kernels, but in a much less pressing way.

The systems where kernel image size really matters are systems with few 
modules where you know in advance which modules you might need. I played 
a bit with the ARM defconfigs, and if you consider that you can't build 
the filesystem for accessing your modules modular I haven't found any 
where making everything modular would have given a real kernel image 
size gain compared to the CONFIG_MODULES=n case.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/