On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:52:17PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-27 17:18:06 -0500, James C. Georgas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-25-02 at 17:01 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense.
> >
> > I've been building it as a module forever. I often load kernels from
> > floppy disk, and building CONFIG_UNIX as a module often makes the
> > difference between the kernel fitting or not fitting on the disk. Could
> > we please keep this functionality?
>
> Same for me. Maybe make the offer of CONFIG_UNIX=m dependant on the
> small/embedded stuff?
This wouldn't solve the problem that CONFIG_UNIX=m forces us to export
symbols that shouldn't be exported:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/18/44
> MfG, JBG
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
