On Mon, 2006-02-27 17:18:06 -0500, James C. Georgas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2006-25-02 at 17:01 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense. > > I've been building it as a module forever. I often load kernels from > floppy disk, and building CONFIG_UNIX as a module often makes the > difference between the kernel fitting or not fitting on the disk. Could > we please keep this functionality? Same for me. Maybe make the offer of CONFIG_UNIX=m dependant on the small/embedded stuff? MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: "James C. Georgas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- References:
- [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- From: "James C. Georgas" <[email protected]>
- [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
- Index(es):