On Po 20-02-06 10:08:36, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > Compatibility is already restored.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, the interface is currently broken. The driver core does not
> > > > > dictate
> > > >
> > > > There were two different interfaces, one accepted 0 and 2, everything
> > > > else was invalid, and second accepted 0, 1, 2, 3.
> > > >
> > > > If you enter D2 on echo 2, you are breaking compatibility with 2.6.15
> > > > or something like that.
> > >
> > > I don't see how this is true. If a process writes "2" to a PCI device's
> > > state file, what else are sane things to do?
> >
> > In some kernel version (2.6.15, iirc), device entered D3 if you wrote
> > "2" to state file, and there are programs out there that depend on
> > it.
>
> Like what?
Search archives. Some PCMCIA, IIRC.
> > > You dropped the fundamental point, and I don't understand why you disagree
> > > with it - the driver core should not be dictating policy to the downstream
> > > drivers. It is currently doing this by filtering the power state that is
> > > passed in via the "state" file.
> >
> > That's best we can do to stay compatible. Please introduce new file,
> > and make states string-based.
>
> You are still overlooking the point - the core should not be filtering the
> values. It currently is, but it's trivial to fix. What is your issue with
> that?
That you are breaking compatibility in middle of 2.6 series. And very
close to 2.6.16 at that.
Pavel
--
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
