On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > Compatibility is already restored. > > > > > > > > No, the interface is currently broken. The driver core does not > > > > dictate > > > > > > There were two different interfaces, one accepted 0 and 2, everything > > > else was invalid, and second accepted 0, 1, 2, 3. > > > > > > If you enter D2 on echo 2, you are breaking compatibility with 2.6.15 > > > or something like that. > > > > I don't see how this is true. If a process writes "2" to a PCI device's > > state file, what else are sane things to do? > > In some kernel version (2.6.15, iirc), device entered D3 if you wrote > "2" to state file, and there are programs out there that depend on > it. Like what? > > You dropped the fundamental point, and I don't understand why you disagree > > with it - the driver core should not be dictating policy to the downstream > > drivers. It is currently doing this by filtering the power state that is > > passed in via the "state" file. > > That's best we can do to stay compatible. Please introduce new file, > and make states string-based. You are still overlooking the point - the core should not be filtering the values. It currently is, but it's trivial to fix. What is your issue with that? Thanks, Pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- References:
- [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- Prev by Date: Areca RAID driver remaining items?
- Next by Date: Re: (pspace,pid) vs true pid virtualization
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
- Index(es):
![]() |