On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Fix the per-device state file to respect the actual state that
> > > is reported by the device, or written to the file.
> >
> > Can we let "state" file die? You actually suggested that at one point.
> >
> > I do not think passing states in u32 is good idea. New interface that passes
> > state as string would probably be better.
>
> Yup, in the future that will be better. For now, let's work with what we
> got and fix 2.6.16 to be compatible with previous versions..
It's _way_ too late in the 2.6.16 cycle for this series of patches, if
that is what you are proposing.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
