hoi :) I'd like to move some of the documentation which sleeps in Documentation/ into the .c files that contain the documented code in the hope that somebody who changes the code also changes the documentation in one go. We already have a system to generate documentation from the .c files, so I made a little experiment and tried to use kernel-doc to build the complete documentation after all text from the template files got moved to the source files. I haven't really succeeded in generating valid docbook output from the source files alone. So I looked at other tools to do this job. Doxygen looks fairly promising and is even already used by some kernel files. You can get a first impression of Doxygen output here: http://tali.admingilde.org/linux-doxygen/html/group__drivermodel.html For these pages I stuffed some files from Documentation/driver-model/ into drivers/base/*.c and changed some kernel-doc comments to Doxygen comments. However there are several drawbacks when using Doxygen: * it doesn't generate DocBook * the source markup does not look as nice as kernel-doc: /** * foo - short description * @param1: parameter description * long description */ gets: /** * short description. * \param param1 parameter description. * long description */ but on the other side it's much more powerful, too. * we need some transition strategy Are there other nice and powerful source documentation systems? Is it even worth trying to integrate parts of the documentation into the source code? What do you think? -- Martin Waitz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: more documentation in source files
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: more documentation in source files
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 0/6] lightweight robust futexes: -V3
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.2.1
- Previous by thread: ioapic/IRQ assignment question
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: more documentation in source files
- Index(es):