Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joerg Schilling wrote:

Surely you're not suggesting that TOG's job is to rubber-stamp bad Solaris decisions...

Are you interested in forcing Solaris to change all interfaces?


In this case, I think it would be entirely appropriate. It's hardly a hardship to maintain the legacy names for backwards compatibility; since those names are nonsensical it is unlikely they'll ever want to be claimed, in which case they can be maintained indefinitely.

However, I would find it much, much worse if names that are *actively misleading and confusing* to the programmer would be included in an international standard and therefore forced upon the rest of the world forever.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux