Joerg Schilling wrote:
I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup. Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years.
Surely you're not suggesting that TOG's job is to rubber-stamp bad Solaris decisions...
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
- Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- From: Matthew Frost <[email protected]>
- Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- References:
- The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
- Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
- The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- Prev by Date: [-mm patch] block/blktrace.c: make blk_trace_cleanup() static
- Next by Date: [2.6 patch] drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c: make ahd_done_with_status() static
- Previous by thread: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- Next by thread: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- Index(es):
 |