Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload

Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >>
> >> Well I don't see any benchmark numbers in the original patch.  Just an
> >> assertion that it "should" help something.
> >>
> > 
> > The regression was in a Ken's commercial database benchmark. I couldn't
> > reproduce it but presumably it did fix it otherwise Ken would would have
> > piped up?
> > 
> 
> BTW, I did actually ask that you hold off merging it until Ken came
> back with some numbers.
> 

So you did.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
    • From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: sb_bread & bforget
• Next by Date: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
• Next by thread: RE: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]