Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload

Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >>
> >> Well I don't see any benchmark numbers in the original patch.  Just an
> >> assertion that it "should" help something.
> >>
> > 
> > The regression was in a Ken's commercial database benchmark. I couldn't
> > reproduce it but presumably it did fix it otherwise Ken would would have
> > piped up?
> > 
> 
> BTW, I did actually ask that you hold off merging it until Ken came
> back with some numbers.
> 

So you did.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
  - From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: sb_bread & bforget
Next by Date: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
Next by thread: RE: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]