Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload

• To: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
• From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
• Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:57:37 +1100
• Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=uu2KMSRjfmr0UB1Dk5+YtzOfefIFkY+rMz8nWrIyd/J9w3EUx9J903zvwfv2IuwP2tXexFnCgFu5vrZJEc9SqktGHA/BJ+roSLIRttLbjpiU5/Lu1mvMirAxL7hLO3k6hrIpKyRiSSaQB0NRnszm+gw5GGvTEHByL2sKUt4yMAo= ;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1

Nick Piggin wrote:

Andrew Morton wrote:

Well I don't see any benchmark numbers in the original patch.  Just an
assertion that it "should" help something.

The regression was in a Ken's commercial database benchmark. I couldn't
reproduce it but presumably it did fix it otherwise Ken would would have
piped up?

BTW, I did actually ask that you hold off merging it until Ken came
back with some numbers.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
    • From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
• Next by Date: Re: Compaq X1050 multiple suspend problems (ACPI, PS2)
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]