"D. Hazelton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Are you accepting such a patch?
>
> If his response to the last patch someone provided is any example the answer
> is going to be no. And I firmly believe the old adage that a leopard can't
> change it's spots.
Any patch that
- does not break things
- fits into the spirit of the currnt implementation
- offers useful new features
- conforms to coding style standards
- does not need more time to integrate than I would need to
write this from scratch
Unfortunately, many people who send patches to me do not follow
these simple rules.
Jörg
--
EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[email protected] (uni)
[email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
