On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:37:09 +0000 (GMT), Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-02-03 09:59:37.000000000 +0000
> > @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static void show_trace_log_lvl(struct ta
> > stack = (unsigned long*)context->previous_esp;
> > if (!stack)
> > break;
> > - printk(KERN_EMERG " =======================\n");
> > + printk(log_lvl);
> > + printk(" =======================\n");
> > }
>
> This is wrong, Hugh. What do you think the priority of the second printk?
> It's not log_lvl, that's for sure.
Are you sure? I've not delved into the printk code itself, but this
does follow the same pattern as in show_stack_log_lvl itself e.g. its
"Call Trace:\n" line. (I am assuming print_context_stack ends with a
newline, as it does.)
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
