On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:37:09 +0000 (GMT), Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote:
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-02-03 09:59:37.000000000 +0000
> @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static void show_trace_log_lvl(struct ta
> stack = (unsigned long*)context->previous_esp;
> if (!stack)
> break;
> - printk(KERN_EMERG " =======================\n");
> + printk(log_lvl);
> + printk(" =======================\n");
> }
This is wrong, Hugh. What do you think the priority of the second printk?
It's not log_lvl, that's for sure.
-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
