Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
>>Did you happen to catch Linus's mail about his preferred approach?
>>
>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113874154731279&w=2
>
> Of course. Logically, it would be final solution.
>
> VPID approach is pragmatic: it does not modify existing logic, rather
> it relies on it. So, it just allows to use virtual pids in a simple
> and efficient way, which is enough for all known tasks.
And how bad would it be for openvz to move away from the vpid approach ? do
you have any plan for it ?
I've also seen that openvz introduces a 'vps_info_t' object, which looks
like a some virtualization backend. I'm not sure to have well understood
this framework. What the idea behind it ? is it to handle different
implementation of the virtualization ?
thanks,
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
