Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:19:22PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

 > > -rw-r--r--    1 davej    davej        1753 Dec 15 23:31 linux-2.6-bzimage.patch
 > > 
 > > To get around some gynamstics in the rpm spec, defining a seperate build target
 > > for every arch, we make every arch grok 'bzImage'. Fugly, but it keeps the
 > > spec cleaner to maintain.
 > 
 > Yup - seen it before. Did not like it.
 > Consistent use of KBUILD_IMAGE across relevant architectures should buy
 > you the same simplicity and a mergeable approach.

tbh, patches like this just sit there, as 'they just work', rarely need
rediffing, the benefit to other people of it being upstream are next to nil
(or someone else would've done it by now), and I'm more motivated to work on
real problems like finding out why we've 3 different flavours of slab corruption right now.

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/