Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> Bzzert.   "GPLv2 only in the context of the Linux kernel" is incompatible
> with GPLv2 and means that resulting kernel is impossible to distribute.

Indeed. The GPL (both v2 and v3) disallow restricting usage. 

So certain _code_ can be either v2 or v3 only, but you can't make that 
decision based on how the code is used. 

So you can't license, for example, your code "udner the GPL only for the 
Linux kernel". Trust me, some companies have actually wanted to do exactly 
that - they wanted to distribute their code, but _only_ for the kernel 
(and you'd not be allowed to use it for any other GPL'd project). That 
just cannot fly. It's either GPL, or it isn't. There's no "GPL with the 
following rules".

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux