Simon Oosthoek <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> really? if it was dual licensed (that's what I meant, perhaps the "or"
> should be an "and"? ;-), v2 in the kernel and v3(or any later version,
> etc.), if the code is used outside of the kernel, it would "fall back
> to" v3+ as soon as it's taken out of the kernel and used in something
> else.
Then, due to the GPLv2 license, anybody can take the version in the kernel
and distribute it further under GPLv2. Exactly because GPL is about keeping
such roads open.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
