On Fri, Jan 27 2006, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > So the systime quoted above is basically useless, it doesn't reflect the
> >
> >real time spent in the kernel by far. I think you should note that when
> >you post these scores, otherwise you're really showing a skewed picture.
> >
> >
> >
> He wasn't expecting me to post the benchmark, and I frankly only looked
> at the real time and forgot there was a systime in there that needed
> cutting out when I posted it. My error, not his. I must say though, the
> real time makes me quite happy, especially considering how CPUs are just
> going to keep getting faster.
Yeah and that's ok, I was just interested in seeing some more
interesting compression benchmarks so I wondered if you had done that.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
- Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
- Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
- Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
- Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
- Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
- Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]