Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Axboe wrote:

On Wed, Jan 25 2006, Hans Reiser wrote:
Notice how CPU speed (and number of cpus) completely determines
compression performance.

cryptcompress refers to the reiser4 compression plugin, (unix file)
refers to the reiser4 non-compressing plugin.

Edward Shishkin wrote:

Here are the tests that vs asked for:
Creation (dd) of 20 tarfiles (the original 200M file is in ramfs)
Kernel: 2.6.15-mm4 + current git snapshot of reiser4

------------------------------------------

Laputa workstation
Uni Intel Pentium 4 (2.26 GHz) 512M RAM

ext2:
real 2m, 15s
sys 0m, 14s

reiser4(unix file)
real 2m, 7s
sys  0m, 23s

reiser4(cryptcompress, lzo1, 64K)
real 2m, 13s
sys 0m, 11s

Just curious - does your crypt plugin reside in user space?


Nop.
This is just wrappers for linux crypto api, zlib, etc..
so user time is zero and not interesting.

Edward.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux