Re: [PATCH][2.6.16-rc1] TPM: tpm_bios needs securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY)

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Ack'ed-by: Kylene Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
> 
> On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 02:00 +0900, Jerome Pinot wrote:
> > Hi,
> >  
> >  >It seems that "TPM Hardware Support" (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on
> >  >"Enable different security models" (CONFIG_SECURITY).
> >  
> >  This does the trick but your patch formatting is broken. This one
> >  applies cleanly against 2.6.16-rc1.
> >  
> >  from: Rui Saraiva
> >  
> >  tpm_bios (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY).
> >  
> >  Signed-off-by: Rui Saraiva <rmps@mail.pt>
> >  Signed-off-by: Jerome Pinot <ngc891@gmail.com>

No, this patch shouldn't be needed once we have the suitable security stubs
in place.

See
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm2/broken-out/tpm_bios-needs-more-securityfs_-functions.patch
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm2/broken-out/tpm_bios-securityfs-error-checking-fix.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/