Re: [PATCH][2.6.16-rc1] TPM: tpm_bios needs securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY)

[Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>]

Ack'ed-by: Kylene Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 02:00 +0900, Jerome Pinot wrote:
> Hi,
>  
>  >It seems that "TPM Hardware Support" (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on
>  >"Enable different security models" (CONFIG_SECURITY).
>  
>  This does the trick but your patch formatting is broken. This one
>  applies cleanly against 2.6.16-rc1.
>  
>  from: Rui Saraiva
>  
>  tpm_bios (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY).
>  
>  Signed-off-by: Rui Saraiva <rmps@mail.pt>
>  Signed-off-by: Jerome Pinot <ngc891@gmail.com>
>  
>  ---
>  diff -Naur a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
>  --- a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig	2006-01-17 16:12:37.000000000 +0000
>  +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig	2006-01-17 16:13:05.000000000 +0000
>  @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>   
>   config TCG_TPM
>   	tristate "TPM Hardware Support"
>  -	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
>  +	depends on EXPERIMENTAL && SECURITY
>   	---help---
>   	  If you have a TPM security chip in your system, which
>   	  implements the Trusted Computing Group's specification,
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/