Re: [PATCH][2.6.16-rc1] TPM: tpm_bios needs securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY)

Hi,
 
 >It seems that "TPM Hardware Support" (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on
 >"Enable different security models" (CONFIG_SECURITY).
 
 This does the trick but your patch formatting is broken. This one
 applies cleanly against 2.6.16-rc1.
 
 from: Rui Saraiva
 
 tpm_bios (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY).
 
 Signed-off-by: Rui Saraiva <[email protected]>
 Signed-off-by: Jerome Pinot <[email protected]>
 
 ---
 diff -Naur a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig	2006-01-17 16:12:37.000000000 +0000
 +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig	2006-01-17 16:13:05.000000000 +0000
 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  
  config TCG_TPM
  	tristate "TPM Hardware Support"
 -	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
 +	depends on EXPERIMENTAL && SECURITY
  	---help---
  	  If you have a TPM security chip in your system, which
  	  implements the Trusted Computing Group's specification,

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][2.6.16-rc1] TPM: tpm_bios needs securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY)
  - From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 2.6.15+]: Trusted Platform depends on Security models
  - From: Rui Saraiva <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm4 failure on power5
Next by Date: Re: Suggested janitor task - remove __init/__exit from function prototypes
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2.6.15+]: Trusted Platform depends on Security models
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][2.6.16-rc1] TPM: tpm_bios needs securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]