On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 16:59 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > I think the CodingStyle suggestion of 80 chars is just fine. I try to > stay within that, and I mostly succeed. The occasional over-the-line is > far better than advocation >> 80 chars per line imho. I agree. It's that "occasional over-the-line" which Andrew is mucking about with in the patch which started this thread; the case where it makes _sense_ to let it go over 80 characters rather than wrapping it. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- References:
- Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
- Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
- Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
- Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.4.32] usb-uhci.c failing "-"
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] SN2 user-MMIO CPU migration
- Previous by thread: Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- Next by thread: Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree
- Index(es):
![]() |