Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench

[Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>]

Martin Bligh wrote:
> Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>
> > Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> >
> > > Peter Williams wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Attached is a new patch to fix the excessive idle problem.  This patch
> > > > takes a new approach to the problem as it was becoming obvious that
> > > > trying to alter the load balancing code to cope with biased load was
> > > > harder than it seemed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok.  Tried testing different-approach-to-smp-nice-problem against the
> > > transition release 2.6.14-rc2-mm1 but it doesn't apply.  Am testing
> > > against 2.6.15-mm3 right now.  Will let you know.
> >
> >
> >
> > Doesn't appear to help if I am analysing the graphs right.  Martin?
>
>
> Nope. still broken.

Interesting.  The only real difference between this and Con's original 
patch is the stuff that he did in source_load() and target_load() to 
nobble the bias when nr_running is 1 or less.  With this new model it 
should be possible to do something similar in those functions but I'll 
hold off doing anything until a comparison against 2.6.15-mm3 with the 
patch removed is available (as there are other scheduler changes in -mm3).

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/