Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench

Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Peter Williams wrote:
> 
> 
>>Attached is a new patch to fix the excessive idle problem.  This patch
>>takes a new approach to the problem as it was becoming obvious that
>>trying to alter the load balancing code to cope with biased load was
>>harder than it seemed.
> 
> 
> Ok.  Tried testing different-approach-to-smp-nice-problem against the
> transition release 2.6.14-rc2-mm1 but it doesn't apply.  Am testing
> against 2.6.15-mm3 right now.  Will let you know.

Doesn't appear to help if I am analysing the graphs right.  Martin?

Also tried to back out the original patch against the 2.6.15-mm3 tree
but that also won't apply (2 rejects).  Peter?

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
• Next by Date: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
• Previous by thread: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Next by thread: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]