Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Peter Williams wrote: > > >>Attached is a new patch to fix the excessive idle problem. This patch >>takes a new approach to the problem as it was becoming obvious that >>trying to alter the load balancing code to cope with biased load was >>harder than it seemed. > > > Ok. Tried testing different-approach-to-smp-nice-problem against the > transition release 2.6.14-rc2-mm1 but it doesn't apply. Am testing > against 2.6.15-mm3 right now. Will let you know. Doesn't appear to help if I am analysing the graphs right. Martin? Also tried to back out the original patch against the 2.6.15-mm3 tree but that also won't apply (2 rejects). Peter? -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- References:
- -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- Prev by Date: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Next by Date: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Previous by thread: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- Next by thread: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- Index(es):