Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Bligh wrote:
But I was thinking more about the code that (in the original) handled 
the case where the number of tasks to be moved was less than 1 but 
more than 0 (i.e. the cases where "imbalance" would have been reduced 
to zero when divided by SCHED_LOAD_SCALE).  I think that I got that 
part wrong and you can end up with a bias load to be moved which is 
less than any of the bias_prio values for any queued tasks (in 
circumstances where the original code would have rounded up to 1 and 
caused a move).  I think that the way to handle this problem is to 
replace 1 with "average bias prio" within that logic.  This would 
guarantee at least one task with a bias_prio small enough to be moved.
I think that this analysis is a strong argument for my original patch 
being the cause of the problem so I'll go ahead and generate a fix. 
I'll try to have a patch available later this morning.


Attached is a patch that addresses this problem. Unlike the description above it does not use "average bias prio" as that solution would be very complicated. Instead it makes the assumption that NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0) is a "good enough" for this purpose as this is highly likely to be the median bias prio and the median is probably better for this purpose than the average.
Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>

Doesn't fix the perf issue.
OK, thanks.  I think there's a few more places where SCHED_LOAD_SCALE 
needs to be multiplied by NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0).  Basically, anywhere 
that it's added to, subtracted from or compared to a load.  In those 
cases it's being used as a scaled version of 1 and we need a scaled 
version of NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0).  I'll have another patch later today.
Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux