Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:23:48PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I've not been following the thread, but if your suggestion is good, then
> better would be to use mmap MAP_SHARED|MAP_ANONYMOUS - that gives memory
> shared between parent and children, without all the nuisance of shmids.

Well you would be right, but children processes do exec() for application(s)
does not know anything about my ideas :) That's why I wanted to take care
about them in parent and do 'cleanup' there.

-- 
- Gábor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
    • From: Gábor Lénárt <[email protected]>
  • Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
    • From: Gábor Lénárt <[email protected]>
  • Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
    • From: Kurt Wall <[email protected]>
  • Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [Patch v2] Replacing 0xff.. with correct DMA_xBIT_MASK
• Next by Date: Re: [Patch v2] Replacing 0xff.. with correct DMA_xBIT_MASK
• Previous by thread: Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
• Next by thread: Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]