On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 18:38 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 18:23, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Would you veto against a section "known regressions" in the final 2.6.15
> > announcement listing this issue with a link to the Bugzilla bug?
>
> Yes for this case. The original was likely so fragile that it might
> break only with minor changes in the hardware configuration.
>
> In general listing known regressions is a good idea though.
>
> It might be a good idea to give them different priorities though - e.g.
> a broken BIOS with a missing workaround is less priority than
> a pure Linux bug.
I'm currently struggling with a probable case of broken BIOS without
workaround, is there a central repository of known simular problems? Is
there a way to pinpoint such problems to prevent people from tossing
these into bugzilla?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
