On Monday 02 January 2006 18:23, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Would you veto against a section "known regressions" in the final 2.6.15
> announcement listing this issue with a link to the Bugzilla bug?
Yes for this case. The original was likely so fragile that it might
break only with minor changes in the hardware configuration.
In general listing known regressions is a good idea though.
It might be a good idea to give them different priorities though - e.g.
a broken BIOS with a missing workaround is less priority than
a pure Linux bug.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
