Re: 2.6.15-rc7: known regressions

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>]

On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:46:36PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.15-rc7 compared to 2.6.14.
> 
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one 
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch 
> of you was declared guilty for a breakage or in any other way involved 
> with one or more of these issues.

[ . . . ]

> Subject    : BUG: spinlock recursion on 2.6.14-mm2 when oprofiling
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/18/95
> Submitter  : Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
> Handled-By : "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
> Status     : unknown, reported against -mm, already fixed in -mm
>              (make-rcu-task_struct-safe-for-oprofile.patch)
>              Is this bug present in Linus' tree?

No, this bug is not present in Linus's tree.

							Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/