On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 21:24 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:10 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Make the plist namespace consistent.
> > >
> > > I think plist_head is much better than pl_head.
> > >
> > > However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate
> > > than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather
> > > agnostic to naming.
> >
> > unhashed seems very meaningless . We're not hashing anything.
>
> Still we already have hlist_empty/hlist_unhashed
That's more connected with hashing , since that's were it gets used. In
this case we're not hashing , or even related to hashing.
> > > Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o
> > > was not changed after rename (as it should be).
> >
> > I didn't check, but I made no code changes so it should be any
> > different.
>
> That is why I asked. It is very easy to make a mistake by accident
> while doing trivial changes, but it is not easy to notice.
I reviewed it prior to submitting it .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]