Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup

On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:10 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> > 
> >         Make the plist namespace consistent.
> 
> I think plist_head is much better than pl_head.
> 
> However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate
> than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather
> agnostic to naming.

unhashed seems very meaningless . We're not hashing anything. 

> Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o
> was not changed after rename (as it should be).

I didn't check, but I made no code changes so it should be any
different.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Let non-root users eject their ipods?
Next by Date: RE: scsi errors with dpt-i2o driver
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]