Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup

Daniel Walker wrote:
> 
>         Make the plist namespace consistent.

I think plist_head is much better than pl_head.

However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate
than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather
agnostic to naming.

Ingo, do you have any preferences?

Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o
was not changed after rename (as it should be).

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 5/9] mutex subsystem, core
Next by Date: Re: [patch 9/9] mutex subsystem, XFS namespace collision fixes
Previous by thread: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]