On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 01:00 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Here are the relevant lines of arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds: > > > > 382 OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf64-x86-64", "elf64-x86-64", "elf64-x86-64") > > 383 OUTPUT_ARCH(1:x86-64) > > 384 ENTRY(phys_startup_64) > > > > Any ideas? Another toolchain quirk? > > The original is > > OUTPUT_ARCH(i386:x86-64) > > It replaced the i386 with 1, which obviously doesn't work. > > Try (full patch again) > It still gives one error, at the final link step: LD arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/vmlinux ld: warning: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/head.o' is incompatible with i386 output Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Jeffrey Hundstad <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Jeffrey Hundstad <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [RFC][patch 00/21] PID Virtualization: Overview and Patches
- Previous by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Next by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Index(es):