On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 01:00 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Here are the relevant lines of arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds:
> >
> > 382 OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf64-x86-64", "elf64-x86-64", "elf64-x86-64")
> > 383 OUTPUT_ARCH(1:x86-64)
> > 384 ENTRY(phys_startup_64)
> >
> > Any ideas? Another toolchain quirk?
>
> The original is
>
> OUTPUT_ARCH(i386:x86-64)
>
> It replaced the i386 with 1, which obviously doesn't work.
>
> Try (full patch again)
OK perfect. The build now completes successfully.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Jeffrey Hundstad <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Jeffrey Hundstad <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Prev by Date: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Next by Date: Re: Multi-thread corefiles broken since April
- Previous by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Next by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Index(es):
 |