Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 16:37 -0600, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:Lee Revell wrote:I'm trying to build an x66-64 kernel on a 32 bit system (Ubuntu 5.10). I added -m64 to the CFLAGS as per the gcc docs. But the build fails with: $ make ARCH=x86_64 [...] CC init/initramfs.oI have successfully done this using Debian/Sid.I added "-m64" to AFLAGS as well and now I get farther: CC arch/x86_64/ia32/syscall32.o AS arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.o arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S:14: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S:16: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S:18: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S:25: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S:27: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.S:29: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sigreturn.S:16: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sysenter.o] Error 1 make: *** [arch/x86_64/ia32] Error 2 Lee
Yes, some commands NEED the -m64 and and WILL NOT work with -m64.Really, try my method. I've done it without all that making a separate binutils non-sense. You do need the 64-bit Debian build tools and 64 bit libraries. These are the ones I have:
amd64-libs amd64-libs-dev lib64gcc1 lib64gfortran0 lib64ncurses5 lib64ncurses5-dev lib64objc1 lib64stdc++6 lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg lib64z1 lib64z1-dev libc6-amd64 libc6-dev-amd64 Yes... here's lin64.tar.gz if you didn't catch my little scripts before.BTW: if there's a better way, please let me know. ...After I got this to work I kinda quit looking ;-)
-- Jeffrey Hundstad
Attachment:
lin64.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- References:
- i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Jeffrey Hundstad <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Prev by Date: Re: spitz: Real time clock?
- Next by Date: Robust futex update:
- Previous by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Next by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
- Index(es):