Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, David Howells wrote: > > > > FROM TO > > ============================== ========================= > > DECLARE_MUTEX DECLARE_SEM_MUTEX > > DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED DECLARE_SEM_MUTEX_LOCKED > > Proper counting semaphore DECLARE_SEM > > That sounds fine. They should be renamed to DEFINE_* while we're there. A "declaration" is "this thing is defined somewhere else". A "definition" is "this thing is defined here". > I wouldn't be adverse to doing that argh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL
- Next by Date: Re: Recursion bug in -rt
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Index(es):
 |