* Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:54:41AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > - i did not touch the 'struct semaphore' namespace, but introduced a
> > 'struct compat_semaphore'.
>
> Because it's totally braindead. Your compat_semaphore is a real
> semaphore and your semaphore is a mutex. So name them as such.
well, i had the choice between a 30K patch, a 300K patch and a 3000K
patch. I went for the 30K patch ;-)
> > - i introduced a 'type-sensitive' macro wrapper that switches down()
> > (and the other APIs) to either to the assembly variant (if the
> > variable's type is struct compat_semaphore), or switches it to the new
> > generic mutex (if the type is struct semaphore), at build-time. There
> > is no runtime overhead due to this build-time-switching.
>
> And this one is probably is a great help to win the obsfucated C
> contests, but otherwise just harmfull.
i never found it to be harmful in any way, and we've now got a year of
experience with them. Could you elaborate?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
