> There are two similar things - struct initializers and compound literals. I know they are not the same, but it's still annoying that gcc arbitarily changes the definition of "GNU C" again. That is why I would consider it more a bug than a feature. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Using C99 in the kernel was Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: Using C99 in the kernel was Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide/sis5513: Add support for 965 chipset
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] atomic_long_t & include/asm-generic/atomic.h V2
- Previous by thread: Re: Using C99 in the kernel was Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Index(es):
 |