On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:42:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > scsi/sd.c is currently getting an ICE. None of the new SAS code compiles, > due to extensive use of anonymous unions. This is just the headers in the luben code which need redoing completely because they're doing other stupid things like using bitfields for on the wire structures. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- References:
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Previous by thread: Re: Using C99 in the kernel was Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Index(es):
 |