Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)

> The problem does not seem to be lack of x86-64 support in the assembler.
> I symlinked /usr/bin/as to /usr/x86_64/bin/x86_64-linux-as and got the
> exact same relocation error.
>

The problem appears to be that your GCC doesn't have support for these
relocations, not AS.
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
  - From: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
  - From: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15-rc5] hugetlb: make make_huge_pte global and fix coding style
Next by Date: Re: usblp suspend failure with 2.6.15-rc5
Previous by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
Next by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]