Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:50:08PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> I'm trying to build an x66-64 kernel on a 32 bit system (Ubuntu 5.10).
> I added -m64 to the CFLAGS as per the gcc docs.  But the build fails
> with:
> 
> $ make ARCH=x86_64
> arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:785: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_64

Ubuntu/Debian provide a biarch gcc, but do not (did not?) provide a biarch
assembler. Building binutils for target x86_64-pc-linux-gnu should help.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Introduce atomic_long_t
• Previous by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
• Next by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]