On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Nick Piggin wrote: > > The framework provides a similar approach by keeping differential counters > > for each processor. > But the accounting delay has the unbounded error problem that the > batching approach does not. Ok. We could switch to batching in order to avoid using the slab reaper. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- Prev by Date: Re: uart_match_port() question
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix RCU race in access of nohz_cpu_mask
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- Next by thread: RE: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- Index(es):
 |