Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:

> Why not have per-node * per-cpu counters?

Yes, that is exactly what this patch implements.
 
> Or even use the current per-zone * per-cpu counters, and work out your
> node details from there?

I am not aware of any per-zone per cpu counters.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
• Next by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]